Napolitano provides insight on tech extremism, e-cigarette ban

Napolitano provides insight on tech extremism, e-cigarette ban


JUDGE, THAT IS ALL I HAVE TO SAY. EVERYBODY KNOWS IT’S YOU. THE SUBTITLE OF THIS MEETING IS EXTREMISM ON LINE. HOW DO YOU DEFINE EXTREMISM? HOW DO THESE FOLKS INSIDE OF THE BELTWAY DEFINE EXTREMISM?>>ONE PERSON’S EXTREMISM IS ANOTHER PERSON’S MAINSTREAM. THIS IS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO DEFINE. THE FIRST AMENDMENT BASICALLY SAYS THE GOVERNMENT SHOULDN’T BE IN THE BUSINESS OF DEFINING IT. WHEN THE SUPREME OCCUR HAS EXAMINED HATE SPEECH AND VIOLENCE IN VIDEO GAMES AND ONLINE, THE SUPREME COURT HAS UPHELD THE RIGHT TO POST ALL OF THAT BECAUSE HATE SPEECH IS PROTECTED AND VISUALIZATIONS OF VIOLENCE, WHETHER REAL VIOLENCE, THAT YOU’RE SEEING A MOVIE OF OR WHETHER DEPICTED VIOLENCE BY CARTOON FIGURES ABSOLUTELY PROTECTED. AINSLEY: IF I GO ON ONE OF THESE PLATFORMS, JUDGE, INCITE VIOLENCE, THAT IS MY AIM. AM I PROTECTED?>>GREAT QUESTION. THE LAST TIME THE SUPREME COURT LOOKED AT THAT, UNANIMOUS OPINION MANY TIMES SAID FOLLOWING, ALL INNOCUOUS SPEECH IS ABSOLUTELY PROTECTED AND ALL SPEECH IS INNOCUOUS WHEN THERE IS TIME FOR MORE SPEECH TO REBUT OR NEUTRALIZE IT. SO AS LONG AS THERE’S TIME IN YOUR HYPOTHETICAL TO CHALLENGE WHAT YOU HAVE SAID, WHETHER OR NOT THE CHALLENGE COMES IS IRRELEVANT. AS LONG AS THERE IS TIME FOR THAT CHALLENGE YOUR SPEECH IS PROTECTED AND YOU’RE NOT LIABLE FOR THOSE WHO FOLLOW YOUR COMMANDS TO ENGAGE IN VIOLENCE. DAVID: THE OTHER THING THEY’RE LOOKING AT IS ACTUAL LIVE TIME VIOLENCE ON INTERNET. THAT DOES HAVE TO BE CURBED, SHOWING MURDER ON INTERNET.>>YOU’RE MAKING JUSTICE ALITO’S DISSENT A FAMOUS CASE. IT DOESN’T SHOW A MURDER OF HUMANS. IT SHOWED HORRIFIC MURDERS OF ANIMALS, REPELLANT MURDERS OF ANIMALS. I DON’T WANT TO DESCRIBE WHAT IS ON THERE. JUSTICE ALITO IN ORDER TO INVIGORATE THE DISSENT DESCRIBED IT DRAMATICALLY. IF YOU WANT TO CHANGE THIS, CHANGE THE FIRST AMENDMENT. PEOPLE WILL DECIDE WHAT THEY WANT TO LOOK AT. VIEWERS WILL DECIDE, NOT THE GOVERNMENT. DAVID: WE MOVE OVER TO JUUL, CONGRESS THREATENED TO, THAT THEY PRODUCE DOCUMENTS OR RISK GETTING A SUBPOENA. I’M WONDERING IF JUUL HAS A NEED TO BE WORRIED ABOUT THEIR FUTURE BECAUSE OF THIS?>>WELL, JUUL PRODUCES A PRODUCT IS REGULATED BY THE FDA THE PROBLEM COMES ABOUT WHEN OTHERS THAN JUUL ADULTTER EIGHT THE PRODUCT. JUUL CANNOT BE RESPONSIBLE WHEN SOMEONE BUY AS CASE OF THEIR PRODUCTS, ADULT RATES THEM. DAVID: TRYING TO APPEAL WITH PEOPLE UNDER AGE, COMING OUT WITH PRODUCTS CALLED BUBBLE GUM, CAPTAIN CRUNCH THAT DO THAT?>>IT IS HARD FOR ME TO BELIEVE CALLING IT BUBBLE GUM AND CAPTAIN CRUNCH THEY COULD CREDIBLY SAY IT IS NOT AIMED AT CHILDREN. THOSE ARE CHILD-LIKE PHRASES. SO WHO IS RESPONSIBLE HERE, JUUL, THE FDA OR THE PARENT? DAVID: FLAVORS OF THESE THINGS, KIDS GET INVOLVED, NOT BECAUSE OF NICOTINE BUT FLAVOR. AS A RESULT OF THE NICOTINE THEY BECOME ADDICTED.>>IT IS REGULATED BY FDA. THE FDA APPROVES MARKETING MATERIALS. AS LONG AS JUUL COMPLIES WITH FDA APPROVALS THE JUUL IS IMMUNE FROM LITIGATION.

34 thoughts on “Napolitano provides insight on tech extremism, e-cigarette ban

  • I have no respect for short Napolitano.
    He turned on the president when he would not give him a position on the Supreme Court.
    He’s another liberal hack.

  • AMERICANS HAVE GOT TO WATCH BRIDGETTE GABRIEL HERE ON YOUTUBE SPEAK ABOUT
    BERNIE SANDERS ENDORSER LINDA SARSOUR AND HER AGENDA TO RID AMERICA OF ITS CONSTITUTION AND ENACT SHARIA LAW !

  • Public needs more info re: "vaping" .. vape tools have become more powerful ( more amps / voltage .. ) allowing nicotine overdosing to escalate .. but also .. oils in the vape are pumped into the lungs. Combined with fungal / bacterial presence , that may be contributing. Not all vapes have nicotine .. or THC .. or CBD … they can be altered to assist asthmatics ( medicines & herbs like oregano ) . An all out ban would be the result of ignorance. Limiting voltage / amperage would be a good start. Education ( & recognition ) of the dangers that oils in the lungs can pose, especially to impared pulmonary systems. Education begins with good / accurate / complete news stories ( and comments from audience / social media ). Another thing to consider is domestic manufacturing which allows avoidance of contaminates ( don't trust foreign sources ) They could easily be manufactured in the same plant as other contraband . How much fentynlol in vape form would be lethal? .. trace amounts ..

  • So, when will they ban all of the mass produced, and extra Nicotine infused, Tobacco products that have been killing people of all ages, all over the globe for at least a Century?
    Although there are some chemicals which were already known, and no longer sold by reputable Vape Shop Owners as a rule, I don't see how it could be possible that none of the very real, "Extra Nicotine, And Added Toxic, And Cancer Causing Chemical Infused", And Proven Deadly, And Highly Addictive, Non-Naturally Occurring, Tobacco Products that can be bought anywhere, by anyone of any age despite the ID requirements under law, can be overlooked by those so called "Authorities", banning Vape, while knowingly, and willfully, helping the tobacco product manufacturers regain their lost profits, and continue to grow.
    In light of all the political crime that "We The People" have witnessed these past 3 years, and counting, who amongst US can maintain a dwindling shred of doubt against the Monumental Possibility, that some very evil people have been, and still continue to amass "Obscene Wealth" while in "Our American Official Public Service", under Oath?

  • They are NOT banning regular tobacco flavored e juice. It's the flavoured, fruit and menthol ones that were banned.

    95% of all Vapes juice sold are flavoured, fruit, and menthol. I smell big tobacco behind the scenes… Wanting to force people back to cigarettes 😏

  • I like captain crunch vape juice and I'm 26!!! Definitely not a child!! But anyway, I quit vaping. I did feel so manly vaping cotton candy, I can't vape anymore because it's not what Jehovah wants, it would displease Jehovah and I'm not trying to displease Jehovah so I can't smoke or vape no more.

  • All candy should be illegal too, any candy appealing to children because candy, sugar is known to be negative on the health, bad for the health. Let's ban candy next, please!! Sugar causes obesity, cavities, sickness, canker sores and is overall bad.

  • Radical jushis terrorist organisation Israel and US doing terrorism all over the world 🏴‍☠️🇮🇱🏴‍☠️😁🏴‍☠️🇮🇱🏴‍☠️🌎🏴‍☠️😁🏴‍☠️🇮🇱🏴‍☠️🌍🏴‍☠️🌎🌎🏴‍☠️🌎🏴‍☠️🌎🏴‍☠️🌍🏴‍☠️🌍🌍🌍

  • Fox uses Napolitano. He is an idiot compared to legal contributors they use. He is a legal scholar in his mind only. Tries to act like an expert on everything. He is a joke.

  • Im 56 and I love my bubble gum and capt. Crunch so that's also a hard sell for me. Under age kids shouldn't have them anyway parents job to know what kids are doing and take action when they find out about it.

  • Juul doesn't have flavors called bubblegum or captain crunch, they have in America, Classic Tobacco, Virginia Tobacco, Menthol, Fruit, Mango, Mint, Creme and Cucumber. The last five sound like flavors seen on ALCOHOL too, no talk of banning them.
    The problem is people putting garbage in a pod and then inhaling it, PERIOD.

  • The DMV sells your personal information. It is a billion dollar gain for the states. Because the states legalize the DMV to sell your personal information. I am not a tech fan but the states are selling your information also. How condescending!

  • This e-cigarette ban is acceptable in the short-term for public safety in light of the current health crisis of likely tainted products putting people in the hospital, but they must not take this too far. People are inherently going to try substances to improve quality of life. Only those with the addiction gene are going to be hopelessly hooked, but the presence of a safer alternative to harder stuff will be far better for society in general. Let's leave that safer option there for the people who occasionally need a pick me up instead of waging another unsuccessful and unpopular drug war that will cause more harm than good. The Feds fear gateway drugs, but we should fear gateway bans, where they used the needed ban of a poisoned product as a springboard to deprive people with legitimate conditions of their needed medicines. While I am not for no regulation, the failed Drug War has proven unnecessary over-regulation is just as harmful. Be neither Libertarian nor Socialist.

  • Social Media did no exist in 1969. The internet had not yet grown beyond ARPANET. Maybe now is the time for some new reasoned SCOTUS case law?

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *